The broad aims of this course are twofold: first, is to consider the significant restraints that defamation law and associated causes of action place on what can be published by the media; and second, is to consider whether the extent and scope of such restraints are appropriate. These aims are pursued through a detailed comparative analysis of defamation law in Australia, the UK and the US, as well as by looking at many of the practical aspects of defamation law that contribute to its impact on media freedom. Particular focus is placed on questioning the appropriate balance between the protection of personal reputation and the media’s perceived role in a democratic society as both ‘watchdog’ and ‘bloodhound’.

More information can be found on the Course Outline Website.