Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes - JURD7782
Faculty: Faculty of Law
School: Faculty of Law
Course Outline: See below
Campus: Sydney
Career: Postgraduate
Units of Credit: 6
EFTSL: 0.12500 (more info)
Indicative Contact Hours per Week: 2
Enrolment Requirements:
Pre-requisite: 36 UOC of JURD courses for students enrolled prior to 2013. For students enrolled after 2013, pre-requisite: 72 UOC of JURD courses.
Excluded: JURD7388, LAWS3188, LAWS8082
CSS Contribution Charge: 3 (more info)
Tuition Fee: See Tuition Fee Schedule
Further Information: See Class Timetable
View course information for previous years.
Description
Recommended Prior Knowledge
Course Objectives
- To develop an understanding of the unique dynamics of disputes between sovereign states in the international system
- To be familiar with the principles of international law that create the obligation upon states to peacefully resolve international disputes
- To examine and critically assess the various settlement mechanisms available for resolving, in a peaceful manner, disputes arising between states.
- To develop awareness of the appropriateness of particular settlement mechanisms to particular disputes
- To apply skills of conflict analysis to international scenarios.
- To develop an awareness of academic literature in the field, including critiques of the proliferation of international judicial bodies.
Main Topics
- Obligations in international law to settle disputes peacefully, including obligations contained in the United Nations Charter and specific international agreements;
- The institutional and ad hoc mechanisms available for state-state dispute settlement, including conciliation, good offices, mediation, fact finding, inquiry, and adjudication;
- The role of non-state actors in international disputes;
- Case studies of selected disputes and institutions, including the settlement of trade disputes in the World Trade Organisation and the 2000 Tokyo Women’s Tribunal;
- Systemic issues in international dispute settlement, such as the availability of enforcement mechanisms; regionalism and the consequences of the increasing number of judicial bodies.
Assessment
Case Study - 20%
Essay - 70%