|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Law, Constitutionalism and Cultural Difference - LAWS8290 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description To what extent should Australian law accommodate the cultural practices of migrant communities? Is international human rights law distinctively western, insufficiently sensitive to "Asian values"? How should cultural minorities be accommodated within the constitutions of ethnically diverse states? This course examines these and other problems, exploring the justifications for cultural accommodation, examining the arguments for and against accommodation, and attempting to assess when and how accommodation is justified. We will apply these theoretical arguments in a range of case studies - ethnic conflict in Fiji; the accommodation of indigenous customary law in Australia and Canada; public schools versus religious schools; the debate over "Asian values"; South African constitutional reform; and others.
LLM Specialisation Human Rights and Social Justice.
Recommended Prior Knowledge None
Course Objectives By the end of the course, you should have obtained:
Assessment
Course Texts Prescribed Recommended
None Resources A course pack will be provided that contains the readings that you will have to prepare for the class sessions and will also form foundational materials for your paper.
|